One workshop per lesson, worked alone in about 45 minutes. Each has four parts: the sheet (print it; it is the plan), the workshop page (explained and practised, with self-checking exercises), the model paragraphs (open only after you have written your own), and the key-terms quiz.
Every workshop is built the same way. The lesson’s case comes first and you take a side before you have the tools. Then the tools: the lesson’s rule, drilled until you can apply it, and a spot-the-error exercise that shows how arguments fail in nameable ways. Then back to your verdict, with criteria instead of answers.
| Lesson | Sheet | Workshop | Models | Terms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 · What is an argument? | sheet | page | models | quiz |
| 2 · Valid and sound | sheet | page | models | quiz |
| 3 · Updating on evidence | sheet | page | models | quiz |
| 4 · Induction | sheet | page | models | quiz |
| 5 · Limits of formal systems | sheet | page | models | quiz |
| 6 · Paradox | sheet | page | models | quiz |
| 7 · Is and ought | sheet | page | models | quiz |
| 8 · Non-classical logic | sheet | page | models | quiz |
The quiz in the last column also runs the other way round, term →
definition: replace gapfill by gapfill-reverse
in the address.